Today, I read a new article in the Wall Street Journal about the increase in uninsured motorists over the past few months. M.P McQueen reports that a recent survey by the Insurance Research Council found that several hundred thousand Americans have dropped their auto insurance over the past year, and that a 1% increase in the unemployment rate results in a 0.5% increase in the number of uninsured drivers.
Experts blame this issue on a perfect storm of higher unemployment and higher premiums hitting consumers at once. The U.S. Labor Department’s consumer price index indicates that auto insurance premiums have increased 3.8% over the past year. While I can’t blame drivers for trying to save money on auto insurance, dropping your insurance isn’t a good way to do it. Not only is driving with insurance illegal in 48 states and Washington, D.C.; but in the event of an accident, all of your assets could be wiped out in court. Also, you can be penalized with a 25-50% increase in premiums when you decide to buy auto insurance again.
A lot of people who have kept their auto insurance have downgraded to the bare minimum coverage, which may not be enough. If you get in an accident with an uninsured driver, uninsured motorist insurance will protect you and compensate your medical expenses. 20 states currently require this type of insurance by law; drivers in other states who don’t have this coverage would have to sue for compensation. Most uninsured drivers don’t have a lot of assets, so you’d be very unlikely to recoup any catastrophic medical expenses. Although uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage adds from 7% to 9% to your insurance premium, the increase in uninsured drivers on the road could make it valuable for drivers in every state.
Find out if your state auto insurance requirements include uninsured motorist coverage.
This is pretty shocking, but it’s more proof that you need to read your auto insurance policy very carefully: Stephanie Day of InjuryBoard wrote that State Farm recently denied a claim to pay for the usage of the jaws of life in responding to an car accident. They refused to compensate the fire department because in their view, the jaws (which extricate an accident victim from a car crash) are not included in the medical payments coverage of the insured, since it is technically a non-medical expense.
